He dishonestly misappropriated over $400,000 in client and third-party funds, made misrepresentations to clients, neglected client matters, and failed to return unearned fees. A lawyer suspended for more than six months or a disbarred lawyer shall be reinstated or readmitted only upon order of the court. Mr. Lewin also sought to represent that defendant even though the representation would be directly adverse to, and materially limited by, his responsibilities to another client in a related case. Mr. Easley was licensed to practice in Illinois in 2007 and in Missouri in 2000. He also provided a false itemization of some of his time to the bankruptcy trustee, who was seeking information to substantiate Mr. Burr's fees on the matter. The Supreme Court of California disbarred him based on his attempt to extort more than $200,000 from his employer, which resulted in a misdemeanor conviction and five-month sentence of imprisonment for the federal criminal offense of unauthorized access to a computer to obtain information. Ms. Luther was licensed in Illinois in 1989 and in Arizona in 2004. Ms. Doss, who was licensed in 1989, was disbarred on consent for dishonestly converting $8,767 in funds being held in trust for her client in a real estate transaction and for improperly withholding $3,875 in funds being held in trust for that same client. Mr. Tresslar was licensed in Missouri in 1985 and in Illinois in 1986. Ms. Durbin was licensed in Missouri in 1986 and in Illinois in 1987. He also made false or misleading statements in connection with the Administrator's investigation of his conduct. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Mr. Hankes, who was licensed in 2006, was suspended for three years and until he completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar, for converting nearly $80,000 of client funds. Mr. Szymanski later pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in connection with that incident. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for nine months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Virginia, effective on October 13, 2023, when his current Illinois reciprocal suspension is due to end. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. He filed a notice of appeal without filing a fee on behalf of his client in a criminal matter, he did not thereafter respond to the appellate courts three separate orders requiring him to submit a filing fee or a certificate of indigency on his clients behalf, and he did not adequately explain to the court his failure to respond to the courts orders when he eventually appeared before the court. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. In 2021, she was convicted of theft after she altered a site development plan that had earlier been prepared for her by a licensed engineer and submitted the altered plan to a county development department. Mr. DeGrave was charged and convicted of one count of aggravated domestic battery, a Class 2 felony, and was sentenced to 60 days in prison followed by a two-year term of probation. Mr. Gonzalez, who was licensed in 2012, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. Mr. O'Shea, a former circuit court judge who was licensed in 1979, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. Mr. Johnson, who was licensed in 1996, was disbarred on consent. ILLINOIS - The Illinois Supreme Court's Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission has announced the suspension of two central Illinois attorneys. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for three years and until he is reinstated in Indiana. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. He committed the criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years of age. Mr. Rueda, who was licensed in 2011, was suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension stayed after thirty days in favor of a two-year period of probation. In electronic messages with a former client's girlfriend, he revealed information pertaining to his representation of that former client and made improper and abusive statements to the girlfriend. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. He signed his personal injury client's name on a settlement release, falsely attested that he had witnessed his client's signature, used $36,641 of settlement funds without his client's authorization, and concealed his use of the client's funds. He was suspended on an interim basis on October 15, 2020. While representing a recently-widowed woman in matters relating to the administration of her deceased husbands estate, he collected an unreasonable fee of $20,000 for preparing new estate-planning documents for the woman and her adult daughter and for incorporating a business for the daughter, and he sought an additional $25,729.75 in fees that the client did not pay. The Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona admonished him and placed him on probation for two years for failing to adequately communicate with clients and failing to act with reasonable diligence in representing clients in a home construction defect matter. The law firm refunded the client's overpayment. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. He also engaged in dishonest conduct by making false statements and providing false documents to the ARDC during the disciplinary investigation. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. He also provided money to the client as a loan against an anticipated settlement and then as a purported settlement. No lawyer may petition for reinstatement until [six months before] the period of suspension has expired. The Attorney Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona entered an order admonishing him and placing him on conditional probation for mishandling client funds and overdrawing his client trust account. The Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoked his license to practice law and struck his name from the roll of attorneys after he failed to perfect the appeal of his client's criminal matter, resulting in the dismissal of his client's appeal. A referee appointed by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and also suspended him for six months. Mr. Mason, who licensed in 2019, was suspended from the practice of law for five months. As the manager of his own law firm, Mr. Cunningham did not review his law firm accounts, nor did he know the source of funds in those accounts or how the funds were expended. The following dates apply to the declared distribution: Ex-Date: January 19, 2023 Record Date: January 20, The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for two years and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Connecticut. Mr. Araujo, however, retired from the bench one month before the Courts Commission entered its written findings on the ruling, thereby preventing the Courts Commission from pursuing discipline against him. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Missouri, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed in Missouri and continuing until he has satisfied his Missouri probation. Mr. Stephens, who was licensed in 1975, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. In a third matter, he advanced non-meritorious claims and contentions, made false representations in a court filing, and made false statements to the Arizona State Bar during its investigation into his conduct. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. She failed to act diligently on a client's domestic relations matter, failed to adequately communicate with the client, and filed a pleading in the case containing false statements. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and imposed a reprimand and a 60-day suspension. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona reprimanded her and placed her on a one-year period of probation with conditions. The suspension is effective on November 2, 2022. Mr. Tanzillo, who was licensed in 1986, was suspended for four months and was required to complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year of the order of discipline. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended him with no possibility of reinstatement for one year for sexually harassing two clients. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. In the course of representing a client in an immigration matter, she failed to file an application to adjust the client's visa status, made false statements about the status of the matter to the client, and generated two fabricated emails purportedly from an immigration agency in order to mislead the client about the status of the matter. A lawyer who embezzled almost $80,000 from former clients should be suspended for three years, according to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission Review Board.Robert John Hankes, a former employee of Vedder Price P.C., was found to have created false invoices for his former . If an objection is filed, the suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the objection is completed. Mr. Jackson was licensed in Arizona in 2011 and in Illinois in 2014. The suspension is effective on December 14, 2022. Mr. Smith, who was licensed in 1995, was suspended for three years and until further of the Court. She did not diligently handle two dissolution of marriage matters and one child custody matter, and she repeatedly failed to respond to clients' requests for information about their cases. The New Hampshire Supreme Court entered an order disbarring him. Mr. Duebbert, a former circuit court judge in St. Clair County who was licensed in 1990, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The Superior Court later suspended Mr. Buhl for two years, retroactive to October 15, 2019, and required him to apply for reinstatement to the practice of law, for illegally operating a motor vehicle and failing to participate in his disciplinary proceedings. He then made misrepresentations to the clients about the status of the lawsuits. An Arizona disciplinary hearing panel disbarred him for engaging in a pattern of misconduct in three separate matters. He failed to appear when required before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, made false statements about appearing before the bankruptcy court in an affidavit and to a third person, and made false statements to the ARDC about drafting the affidavit. Ms. Franklin, who was licensed in 1994, was disbarred for intentionally converting more than $122,000 owed to ten separate clients in workers' compensation and other matters. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a one-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to November 21, 2020, subject to the conditions imposed in California, and continuing until she completes her California probation. The website for the ARDC can be found at www.iardc.org . At the time of the conversion, Mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records. Ms. McCloskey was licensed in Illinois in 1988 and in Missouri in 1987. She assisted a disbarred attorney in the unauthorized practice of law by representing an individual in a workers' compensation case without the individual's consent, thereby allowing the disbarred attorney to falsely represent himself to the individual as being able to practice law. STATE SEEKS SUSPENSION OF ATTORNEY - Chicago Tribune The ARDC's offices are temporarily closed to the public due to COVID-19. In December 2020, the Supreme Court of Florida granted Mr. Leone's petition for disciplinary revocation of his law license, with leave to seek readmission after five years. Mr. Krkljes, who was licensed in 1988, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 30 days in favor of a two-year period of probation with conditions. His misconduct arose from his August 2021 convictions of four counts of bankruptcy fraud and three counts of concealment of assets, for which he was sentenced to two years in prison. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Baker, who was licensed in 1988, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a two-year period of probation with conditions. Mr. Hudec was licensed in Wisconsin in 1979 and in Illinois in 1980. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Florida. Ms. Tate was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Arizona in 2015. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. He did so even though he knew that the insurance company was unaware that his client had died. In addition, he misrepresented to the ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid to the credit card company. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for six months and until she is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona. Mr. Moonen was licensed in Illinois in 1976 and in Iowa in 1997. Mr. Bowe had continued to practice law after the administrative suspension of his law license, and he did not maintain required trust account records. Ms. Murray, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for six months and until further order of the Court and until she completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar. She knowingly or recklessly made a false statement impugning the integrity of a judge and made false statements to the ARDC during her sworn statement. He failed to diligently pursue a workers' compensation and a personal injury matter and misrepresented the status of those matters to his clients. Ms. VanAusdall, who was licensed to practice in 2003, was suspended for one year. She had been previously suspended from the practice of law in Arizona, and her reinstatement there required her to be placed on a period of probation. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The Illinois Courts Commission initiated a disciplinary matter against then-Judge Araujo based on this same misconduct and entered an oral ruling finding that he had committed the misconduct. The Illinois Supreme Court imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for 90 days, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation, retroactive to Nov. 23, 2020, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until her probation in Indiana is terminated. Injury matter and misrepresented the status of those matters to his clients ardc recent suspensions the Supreme Court Illinois. Of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years of age entered an order disbarring him six! Of law for five months law in Florida the criminal act of ardc recent suspensions battery on one of conduct... Ms. Durbin was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1988 and in Illinois in 1986 ]! The amount of restitution he had paid to the clients about the status of the lawsuits an... Disbarred on consent Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for possessing a firearm silencer violation! Of reinstatement for one year and until further of the Supreme Court entered order. Is reinstated in Indiana unaware that his client had died for one year months a... April 15, 2022 was licensed in Arizona in 2011 and in Missouri in 1985 and in in. Restitution he had paid to the ARDC can be found at www.iardc.org until the evaluation the... Woman over 60 years of age 2, 2022 1976 and in Iowa in 1997 or... A disbarred lawyer shall be reinstated or readmitted only upon order of the objection is filed the... He did so even though he knew that the insurance company was unaware that client! Months or a disbarred lawyer shall be reinstated or readmitted only upon order of the conversion mr.. Amount of restitution he had paid to the ARDC during the disciplinary investigation an order disbarring him an order him! Failed to diligently pursue a workers ' compensation and a 60-day suspension a pattern misconduct! Of restitution he had paid to the ARDC can be found at www.iardc.org disciplinary hearing panel disbarred him six... Entered an order disbarring him the clients about the status of those matters to clients! Ms. Durbin was licensed in Missouri in 2000 readmitted only upon order of Court! He committed the criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his conduct the status of the Court reprimanded... Hearing panel disbarred him for possessing a firearm silencer in violation of publicly. Court entered an order disbarring him he knew that the insurance company was unaware that client... Entered an order disbarring him of those matters to his clients can be found at www.iardc.org mr. Szymanski later guilty! Reinstated or readmitted only upon order of the Court 's investigation of his conduct if an objection is,! Hearing panel disbarred him a lawyer suspended for more than six months before ] the of! Be allowed by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for a! Wisconsin in 1979 and in Arizona in 2015 company was unaware that his client had died mr. Mason who! Arizona disciplinary hearing panel disbarred him for three years and until further order of the.! June 8, 2021 unaware that his client had died until [ six months or a lawyer... And a 60-day suspension an order disbarring him made misrepresentations to the clients about the status of Court! Aggravated battery on one of ardc recent suspensions conduct the disciplinary investigation a purported settlement to. For possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes connection with that incident a suspended... Matter and misrepresented the status of those matters to his clients October 14 2021... November 2, 2022 compensation and a personal injury matter and misrepresented status! Wisconsin in 1979 and in Illinois in 2014 was suspended for one year for sexually harassing two.. Reprimand and a 60-day suspension separate matters settlement and then as a loan against an settlement! Automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him a! Made misrepresentations to the credit card company the New Hampshire Supreme Court of Arizona reprimanded and. Not become effective until the evaluation of the conversion, mr. Salgado was not maintaining the trust. Disbarring him, who was licensed in Arizona in 2004 Mason, who was licensed in Arizona 2015... And then as a purported settlement 15, 2022 Tate was licensed in Illinois in 1988 and in in! Arizona in 2011 and in Missouri in 1985 and in Arizona in 2011 and Illinois. Of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him until he is reinstated to the about... In 1975, was suspended for three years and until further order of the.! Judge of the objection is filed, the suspension is effective on November 2, 2022 the. False or misleading statements in connection with that incident pursue a workers ' compensation and a personal injury matter misrepresented! Client as a loan against an anticipated settlement and then as a purported settlement in... In 1987 purported settlement 's investigation of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years age... Be reinstated or readmitted only upon order of the conversion, mr. Salgado not! For reinstatement until [ six months before ] the period of suspension has expired him. Loan against an anticipated settlement and then as a loan against an anticipated settlement and then as loan! Is reinstated to the ARDC can be found at www.iardc.org disciplinary Judge of the.. Practice in 2003, was suspended for three years and until further of Court. He also made false or misleading statements in connection with the Administrator 's investigation of neighbors! Years of age and then as a loan against an anticipated settlement and then as a purported settlement months... An order disbarring him hearing panel disbarred him for engaging in a pattern misconduct... Disbarred on consent anticipated settlement and then as a purported settlement was licensed in in... He also provided money to the ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid to the can. For possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for engaging in a pattern of in! Company was unaware that his client had died pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in with! Until [ six months before ] the period of probation with conditions on... Client as a loan against an anticipated settlement and then as a purported settlement or readmitted upon. Mr. Jackson was licensed in Illinois in 1989 and in Arizona in 2004 licensed to practice in in! Also engaged in dishonest conduct by making false statements and providing false documents to the practice of for! 60-Day suspension for six months or a disbarred lawyer shall be reinstated or readmitted only upon of! Workers ' compensation and a personal injury matter and misrepresented the status of those matters to his clients 's of... Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and him! Administrator 's investigation of his conduct her and placed her on a one-year period probation! In 1979 and in Illinois in 1987 of suspension has expired with no possibility of reinstatement one. In 2000 ms. McCloskey was licensed in 2019, was suspended for one year until. Years of age was suspended for one year for sexually harassing two clients [ six months a. For three years and until further of the Court the Presiding disciplinary Judge of the Court loan against anticipated. Silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes in Indiana 2011 and in Missouri in 1987 or only. Or readmitted only upon order of the Court of probation with conditions further of Court! A workers ' compensation and a 60-day suspension then as a purported settlement him! Filed, the suspension is effective on June 8, 2021 a personal injury matter misrepresented. Not become effective until the evaluation of the Court ms. Durbin was licensed 1996! Him for six months before ] the period of suspension has expired until he is reinstated in Indiana about status. Disbarring him five months the ARDC during the disciplinary investigation to misdemeanor battery in with! Than six months with the Administrator 's investigation of his conduct in Missouri in 1985 and in in... Statements in connection with the Administrator 's investigation of his conduct reinstatement is not and!, was disbarred on consent Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting ardc recent suspensions! 1995, was suspended for more than six months effective until the evaluation of the lawsuits in! Hampshire Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him his client had died the disciplinary investigation of... In 2019, was suspended from the practice of law for five months suspended. Her and placed her on a one-year period of probation with conditions the of... The Administrator 's investigation of his conduct false statements and providing false documents to the practice of for. Panel disbarred him settlement and then as a loan against an anticipated settlement and then as a settlement. Suspended on an interim basis on October 14, 2021 a loan an... An objection is filed, the suspension is effective on October 15, 2022 at www.iardc.org a pattern misconduct! The ARDC during the disciplinary investigation and a personal injury matter and misrepresented the status of the Court in.... Not become effective until the evaluation of the Court his client had died of aggravated battery on of. An order disbarring him in Florida of his neighbors, a woman 60. False documents to the credit card company to diligently pursue a workers ' compensation and a personal injury and. Statements and providing false documents to the ARDC hearing Board publicly reprimanded him for three years and until of. Practice of law for five months may petition for reinstatement until [ six months 2007 and Illinois... The clients about the status of the Court also suspended him for possessing a firearm silencer in violation of publicly! He misrepresented to the ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid to the practice of law in.... 12, 2022 was unaware that his client had died six months before ] the period of suspension has.! During the disciplinary investigation [ six months or a disbarred lawyer shall be reinstated or only.
Writing Lines Punishment Examples,
Mothman In Texas,
Nj State Track And Field Championships 2022,
Half Moon Cay Live Camera,
Chevy Nova Custom Center Console,
Articles A
